Search found 2325 matches

by oldtimer
Sun Sep 12, 2021 11:22 pm
Forum: High School BOYS
Topic: 2021 CIFSS D1 Thread
Replies: 348
Views: 92425

Re: 2021 CIFSS D1 Thread

You all are much better at handicapping this division by seeing games than I can do simply by scraping data from CIF, but with the limited data available at this point it looks like

1. HW
2. HB
3. NH

After that there isn't enough info to make rankings with any confidence.
by oldtimer
Sun Sep 12, 2021 11:14 pm
Forum: High School BOYS
Topic: 2021 CIFSS D6 Thread
Replies: 15
Views: 2590

Re: 2021 CIFSS D6 Thread

With limited data, it looks like top 3 at this point are:

Santa Fe
Westminster
Saddleback
by oldtimer
Sun Sep 12, 2021 10:30 pm
Forum: High School BOYS
Topic: 2021 CIFSS D2 Thread
Replies: 30
Views: 7478

Re: 2021 CIFSS D2 Thread

Looks like a number of teams have not reported all of their results to CIF, so this is pretty thin data. At the moment, in no particular order, these are the teams with the best looking records:

Westlake
Aliso Niguel
San Marcos
Irvine
Edison
by oldtimer
Sun Sep 12, 2021 10:25 pm
Forum: High School BOYS
Topic: 2021 CIFSS D5 Thread
Replies: 27
Views: 4913

Re: 2021 CIFSS D5 Thread

Based on current CIF data base results, it looks like the following to me: 1. Carpinteria (has beaten 4 teams in a higher division and not lost to a D5 team) 2. Downey (has beaten 5 D5 teams and one higher division team) 3. Burbank (has beaten 3 teams in a higher division) 4. Centennial/Corona (5-0 ...
by oldtimer
Sun Sep 12, 2021 10:12 pm
Forum: High School BOYS
Topic: 2021 CIFSS D4 Thread
Replies: 16
Views: 3154

Re: 2021 CIFSS D4 Thread

Preliminary guess for top 6 based on available data:

1. Portola
2. Crespi
3. Elsinore
4. Glendale
5. Buena Park
6. La Canada
by oldtimer
Sun Sep 12, 2021 10:04 pm
Forum: High School BOYS
Topic: 2021 CIFSS D3 Thread
Replies: 10
Views: 2824

Re: 2021 CIFSS D3 Thread

Based on admittedly thin data scraped from the CIFSS database, D3 looks something like this: 1. Brea Olinda 2. Thousand Oaks 3. St. Francis 4. Rancho Cucamonga 5. Troy 6. Walnut 7. Chadwick After that is a mix of teams. Will need another few weeks of data to start sorting things out, I think. Thousa...
by oldtimer
Sat Sep 11, 2021 6:08 pm
Forum: High School BOYS
Topic: 2021 CIFSS D5 Thread
Replies: 27
Views: 4913

Re: 2021 CIFSS D5 Thread

1. Valley View
2. Downey
3. Citrus Valley

But there are a lot of teams I haven't seen.
by oldtimer
Thu Sep 09, 2021 1:55 pm
Forum: High School BOYS
Topic: 2021 CIFSS D1 Thread
Replies: 348
Views: 92425

Re: 2021 CIFSS D1 Thread

oldtimer, not self serving — I have zero skin involved as I don’t have any involvement in the CIF-SS other than being a fan that is in favor of kids being allowed to play. As a fan, I think the transfer rules are outdated and don’t align with what we are seeing in NCAA and pro sports which now favo...
by oldtimer
Thu Sep 09, 2021 1:48 pm
Forum: High School BOYS
Topic: 2021 CIFSS D1 Thread
Replies: 348
Views: 92425

Re: 2021 CIFSS D1 Thread

Many comments about transfer rules and coaches whining are pretty shallow - and likely self-serving. CIF is a 'self-reporting' organization. In other words, it does not have the money or time to go investigating every school or possible rule violation. Instead, it relies upon schools/coaches report...
by oldtimer
Thu Sep 09, 2021 12:20 pm
Forum: High School BOYS
Topic: 2021 CIFSS D1 Thread
Replies: 348
Views: 92425

Re: 2021 CIFSS D1 Thread

Many comments about transfer rules and coaches whining are pretty shallow - and likely self-serving. CIF is a 'self-reporting' organization. In other words, it does not have the money or time to go investigating every school or possible rule violation. Instead, it relies upon schools/coaches reporti...
by oldtimer
Tue Sep 07, 2021 11:53 am
Forum: Olympic Development Program
Topic: Has anyone heard anything about ODP?
Replies: 29
Views: 18059

Re: Has anyone heard anything about ODP?

I am quite sure that many on here know ODP coaches and know athletes that have been involved with ODP. While it is a fun, and even motivating, experience for the athletes, I wouldn't say it is 'developmental' other than the opportunity to play in higher level competitions than they normally would (t...
by oldtimer
Mon Sep 06, 2021 9:34 pm
Forum: New News and Posts
Topic: New USAWP website
Replies: 9
Views: 1867

New USAWP website

Has anyone logged in to the new website and tried to do anything? Either my credentials for admin hasn't been propagated, or the new site is seriously lacking in functionality compared to the old site. I have tried looking up event/tournament info, and there is nothing there. When I do enter tournam...
by oldtimer
Mon Sep 06, 2021 7:13 pm
Forum: High School BOYS
Topic: 2021 CIFSS D3 Thread
Replies: 10
Views: 2824

Re: 2021 CIFSS D3 Thread

Based on admittedly limited data, right now it looks like:

1. Brea Olinda
2. Walnut
3. Troy
4. St. Francis
5. Bonita
6. Rancho Cucamonga

Not in any specific order, other than just overall record and head-to-head vs. other random D3 teams.
by oldtimer
Mon Sep 06, 2021 3:07 pm
Forum: High School BOYS
Topic: 2021 CIFSS D4 Thread
Replies: 16
Views: 3154

Re: 2021 CIFSS D4 Thread

I don't know how long they will be there, but here is the link: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nppu_LdR2U22_-4mOmxZsTBZLtrkPZ-ksh-SghdhZ0c/edit#gid=0 Some of the scores have not made their way into the CIF database, so are not reflected in my rankings. It was pointed out to me that La Canad...
by oldtimer
Mon Sep 06, 2021 11:38 am
Forum: High School BOYS
Topic: 2021 CIFSS D4 Thread
Replies: 16
Views: 3154

Re: 2021 CIFSS D4 Thread

Based on my dump of CIF scores (not all are entered, but I know results from last weekend's Corona Invite), my guess is that the rankings for D4 should be:

1. Portola
2. Crespi
3. Elsinore
4. Glendale
5. Several teams could fit here.

Go to advanced search